Evolution is “just a theory”, isn’t it? I bet you’ve encountered this frustrating and silly argument many times before, but alas, now you have a Rationality Rules video to throw against your adversaries (who won’t watch this video and will still insist that you’re wrong, haha). Anyhow, for what it’s worth, here’s my take on the claim that evolution is just a theory.
1. Equivocation Fallacy:
The first major flaw with the argument that Evolution is Just a Theory, is that it commits, and that it pretty much entirely is, a huge Equivocation Fallacy. An Equivocation Fallacy is the misleading use of a word or a term with more than one meaning, by glossing over which meaning is intended at a particular time.
And in this case, the Equivocation Fallacy occurs in the word ‘theory’. The argument uses one definition of the word ‘theory’ during its first and third premises – that being, “an idea used to account for a situation or justify a course of action”; but it uses another definition of the word ‘theory’ during its second premise – that being, “a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed, preferably using a written, pre-defined protocol of observations and experiments”, and because it switches between these two definitions to attain its conclusion, it’s not a coherent argument.
2. Scientifically Illiterate
To raise another… not so much of a flaw but rather a comment, proponents of the Just a Theory argument tend not only be unaware of what a scientific theory is, but they also tend to be unaware of the four degrees of scientific knowledge altogether… that being facts, laws, hypotheses, and of course theories.
To put it simply;
A scientific fact is an objective and verifiable observation. For example, it’s cold outside.
A scientific law is a description of how some aspect of the universe behaves under stated circumstances (but not why). For example, Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation.
A scientific hypothesis is, for intent and purposes, an educated guess. It’s very similar to the everyday layman definition of the word theory. For example, eating vegetables causes weight loss because they’re low in calories but are high in fibre.
And a scientific theory is a rigorously tested and confirmed hypothesis that accounts for all related facts and laws, and has been proven to accurately predict future findings and phenomenon. Or as Matt Dillahunty puts it, “a theory is the highest possible achievement of science”.
Hence, calling evolution a theory, which it is, is actually a tremendous compliment!
3. Fact & Theory:
The last small point I want to make on this matter is that evolution is technically both a fact and a theory. It’s an uncontroversial fact that organisms have changed (or evolved) during the history of life of Earth, and the theory as to why these organisms have changed (or evolved) is called Natural Selection.
Just as gravity is a fact, so is evolution; and just as General Relatively is a scientific theory, so is Natural Selection.
As always, I hope you enjoyed the video!
[Video and text source: Rationality Rules You Tube channel]Related Videos
Can Brain Alone Explain Consciousness?
April 13, 2020
Sean Carroll: Common Quantum Mechanics Misconceptions
April 13, 2020
Annaka Harris: Interview – Challenge Everything
March 28, 2020
Steven Pinker: The Philosophy of Free Will
March 28, 2020
Quirkology – 10 Amazing Illusions
March 25, 2020

